eLife’s peer review approach leads to loss of impact factor
Discover how eLife’s innovative peer review model has led to the removal of its impact factor.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Discover how eLife’s innovative peer review model has led to the removal of its impact factor.
Find out how the ERROR project pays reviewers to identify mistakes in published papers.
Richard Sever talks about the future of peer review, the role of preprint servers, and how we might untangle research evaluation from research dissemination.
In an article published in The New York Times, Professor Aaron E. Carroll critiques the peer review system and provides a number of suggestions for improvements.
Mary Yianni, Publisher at Taylor and Francis, reviews the different models of peer review and the emerging role of preprints.
Missed the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMPP? Read the second part of our meeting report to get up to speed!
As PubMed Commons closes due to lack of use, what does this tell us about engagement with medical publications and post-publication peer review?