Over 100 institutions back eLife’s reviewed preprint model
Find out more about how eLife’s loss of impact factor has been received.
Restoring trust in science: a proposed framework for verifying researcher identity
Publication fraud is eroding trust. Find out how one new framework encourages the active authentication of research paper contributors.
The vital role of inclusive publishing in advancing science
Explore how inclusive publishing offers scientific and societal value beyond traditional citation metrics.
Difficulty assigning peer review is exacerbating publication delays: is it time for a new approach?
With peer review requests skyrocketing in recent years, securing reviewers is more challenging than ever: discover some potential solutions.
Rapid review, rigorous review: Sam Cavana on the role of publishers in ensuring the quality of fast-track publications
Sam Cavana talks about the delicate balance between speed and scientific integrity in the age of accelerated publishing.
What do the public think of preprints?
Get up to speed on why the general public struggle to understand preprint status.
Why aren’t more journals publishing plain language summaries?
A recent survey sheds light on publisher perspectives on plain language summaries and the barriers to their wider adoption.
eLife’s peer review approach leads to loss of impact factor
Discover how eLife’s innovative peer review model has led to the removal of its impact factor.
What does the future hold for preprints: credibility vs accessibility?
Find out why measures to improve the credibility of preprints may be at odds with their core strengths.
Paying patient and public reviewers: is The BMJ’s bold move justified?
The BMJ will now pay patient and public reviewers. Learn why this move matters for diversity in patient engagement and the future of medical publishing.
Embracing AI in publishing: a game-changer for peer review?
Discover how publishers are developing AI tools to improve peer review and streamline publishing workflows.
AI-accelerated innovation: how can publishers keep up?
Explore how publishers could harness AI-enabled peer review to meet the increasing demands of AI-driven research.
Will generative AI transform peer review?
Find out how generative AI tools could revolutionise peer review and help protect research integrity.
Global stakeholders respond to cOAlition S’s “Towards Responsible Publishing” proposal
Discover what global stakeholders thought about open access proposal “Towards Responsible Publishing” ahead of cOAlition S’s response.
Uncovering scientific ERRORs: can financial rewards work?
Find out how the ERROR project pays reviewers to identify mistakes in published papers.
eLife’s ‘reviewed preprint’ model: results from the first year
Find out what happened in the year since eLife ended accept/reject decisions in favour of ‘reviewed preprints’.