Meetings that matter: designing events for impact, integrity, and innovation
Find out how compliance, innovation, and new engagement strategies are reshaping medical meetings in our summary of The Future of Healthcare Meetings 2024.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Find out how compliance, innovation, and new engagement strategies are reshaping medical meetings in our summary of The Future of Healthcare Meetings 2024.
As another study reveals an alarming number of hyperprolific authors, find out more about how high-volume publishing can impact research integrity.
Read about a new tool designed to improve the clarity of infographics and visual abstracts in comparative health research.
Discover how efforts to promote open science through new metrics may conflict with initiatives to reform research assessment.
Discover the importance of visuals for engaging readers, best practices for inclusivity and accessibility, and views on the role of AI.
Clear communication is key: read on for some top tips.
Already read our day one report from the Annual Meeting of ISMPP? Here’s everything you need to know from day two!
Missed the meeting? Read our report to get up to speed!
Sam Cavana talks about the delicate balance between speed and scientific integrity in the age of accelerated publishing.
Get up to speed on why the general public struggle to understand preprint status.
A recent survey sheds light on publisher perspectives on plain language summaries and the barriers to their wider adoption.
Read more about the BMJ’s response to the US government instruction for CDC authors to withdraw articles reporting sex and gender data.
Discover the benefits of international collaboration when incorporating AI in life science research.
Explore alternatives to the gamification of academic metrics and discover how to achieve genuine research impact beyond traditional scoring systems.
Discover how eLife’s innovative peer review model has led to the removal of its impact factor.
Problematic research continues to be cited in scientific literature. Is technology the answer?