How does failure to falsify influence the reliability of scientific research?
Read about a proposed way to tackle the reproducibility crisis in research and accelerate scientific progress.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Read about a proposed way to tackle the reproducibility crisis in research and accelerate scientific progress.
Missed the symposium? Read our report to get up to speed!
The 17 items to include when reporting clinical trial outcomes. Read about the CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension checklist for outcomes of all randomised clinical trials.
Read more on the results of a survey that asked 47,000 academics about their opinions, behaviours, and experiences surrounding research integrity.
Familiarise yourself with the FAIR for Research Software principles, which aim to improve research transparency and reproducibility.
eLife hopes inclusion of open peer review reports and standardised assessments will help improve transparency and accessibility of research.
AI-based science comes under scrutiny: read about the growing crisis in machine learning.
Find out why, despite implementation of mandates, current research data may not be FAIR.
Read about the new weapon in the fight against bogus scientific research articles.
What’s standing in the way of researchers adopting good practices on clinical trial data sharing and transparency?
Read about the results of Nature’s transparent peer review pilot and how it could benefit the research community.
Find out how authors’ self-disclosures compare with payment data reported by the medical industry.
A recent analysis of randomised controlled vaccine trials suggests there are still improvements to be made.
Learn all about the new WHO data sharing policy and their practical guidance on data sharing plans.
Read about the potential impacts of large language models, and what needs to happen to ensure they benefit, rather than hinder, scientific fields.
An analysis of 47 BMJ journals found that under one-third of peer reviewers were women.