TagPeer review publication

Over 100 institutions back eLife’s reviewed preprint model

Find out more about how eLife’s loss of impact factor has been received.

Publication fraud is eroding trust. Find out how one new framework encourages the active authentication of research paper contributors.

Explore how inclusive publishing offers scientific and societal value beyond traditional citation metrics.

With peer review requests skyrocketing in recent years, securing reviewers is more challenging than ever: discover some potential solutions.

Discover how publishers are developing AI tools to improve peer review and streamline publishing workflows.

Explore how publishers could harness AI-enabled peer review to meet the increasing demands of AI-driven research.

Find out what happened in the year since eLife ended accept/reject decisions in favour of ‘reviewed preprints’.

Read about proposed strategies to make peer review less burdensome and improve the quality of published research.

Read about ways in which peer review could develop and diversify to keep up with modern research demands.

Read about the main drivers of increased journal turnaround time over the last decade.

Read about the results of Nature’s transparent peer review pilot and how it could benefit the research community.

An analysis of 47 BMJ journals found that under one-third of peer reviewers were women.

Learn about the importance of short communications in scientific publishing and the potential impact of their decline.

Read about the pros and cons of disclosing reviewer identities as part of the open review process.

Find out more about ICMJE’s latest recommendations on the use of preprints in scientific publishing.

Read some perspectives on how integrating presubmission and preprint reviews into journal systems could facilitate the current peer review process.