Site icon The Publication Plan for everyone interested in medical writing, the development of medical publications, and publication planning

What to do when peer review feels inadequate?

How should scientists think about papers that have undergone what appears to be a cursory peer review? Perhaps the papers were reviewed in a day — or less — or simply green-lighted by an editor, without an outside look. That’s a question Dorothy Bishop, an Oxford University autism researcher, asked herself when she noticed some troubling trends in four autism journals…. See here for the full article, including a poll for you to complete.

Categories

Peer review

Exit mobile version