2021 International Open Access Week is here!
Find out more about this year’s Open Access Week, themed ‘It matters how we open knowledge: building structural equity’.
A central online news resource for professionals involved in the development of medical publications and involved in publication planning and medical writing.
Find out more about this year’s Open Access Week, themed ‘It matters how we open knowledge: building structural equity’.
The suggestion that preprints could replace traditional journals has been debated. Dr Haseeb Irfanullah provides arguments against this view.
Read Brian Southwell’s perspective on what can be done to prevent misinformation and build public trust in science.
A recent study found that authors with certain characteristics are more likely to publish open access, potentially leading to bias.
We’ve heard of open data, but should we also consider open methods as standard?
Analysis of Elsevier’s article metadata and invoicing information provides insights into the uptake of hybrid open access.
Find out more about the proposed policies and progress towards their adoption.
Learn whether open access journal articles benefit from a citation advantage over subscription journal articles.
Publication Lead Chris Brooks discusses the impact of COVID-19 on medical communications.
Read Lucy Turner’s perspective on the impact of COVID-19 on medical publications and congresses.
Publisher of Science journals update their Green open access policy for authors of research funded by cOAlition S organisations to allow Plan S compliance.
Find out how COVID-19 has benefited data sharing and what your organisation can do to advance open science from the State of Open Data 2020 report.
Read Becca Wilson’s perspectives on the current reality and future opportunities for disability inclusivity in medical research and communications.
Learn more about this useful tool for checking compliance when publishing cOAlition S funded research articles.
Missed the meeting? Read our report to get up to speed!
Read Suzanne Farley’s perspectives on the steps one publisher is taking to address the growing problem of research misconduct.